Quantcast
Channel: NASA
Viewing all 3026 articles
Browse latest View live

Humans put a man on the moon before calculators were even invented

$
0
0

Apollo 13 Mission Control

"I am, and ever will be, a white-socks, pocket-protector, nerdy engineer, born under the second law of thermodynamics, steeped in steam tables, in love with free-body diagrams, transformed by Laplace and propelled by compressible flow."

If the preceding statement brings to mind the ultimate in nerdom, you'd be mistaken—they're the words of pioneering astronaut Neil Armstrong in a 2000 speech. But though Armstrong was more badass than pencil-necked geek, he certainly used one of geekery's most powerful tools—the humble slide rule.

It's already pretty amazing that a computer with 64 Kb of memory was able to put a man on the Moon. But what's even more amazing is what NASA managed to accomplish without computers. That's where the slide rule comes in (oh, and it was black female mathematician, Katherine G. Johnson, who calculated the Apollo 11 trajectory to the Moon!).

A slide rule is a kind of computer itself—the very basic, very analog kind. Though it looks like a ruler, it's really a way to quickly multiply, divide, and calculate logarithms and other functions. Engineers used slide rules to process rocket propulsion data, perform everyday calculations, and come up with coordinates. And a Pickett slide rule was standard issue for Apollo program astronauts, who used them in space.

Perhaps the most impressive use of the slide rule was during the Apollo 13 crisis. Engineers had to recalculate data to guide the crew safely back to Earth—and they had to do it quickly. Richard Ogle describes how it went down:

NASA had at its disposal whole banks of sophisticated computers, of course, but these were not programmed to do the basic calculations [Commander Jim Lovell] needed. So the engineers reverted to that most mundane pre-pocket calculator workhorse, the slide rule….Had the engineers at Mission Control been forced to do the necessary calculations on paper, Apollo 13 might well have missed the trajectory needed to bring it back to earth altogether. Instead the slide rule, designed specifically to exploit human beings' highly developed visual acuity, allowed them to perform a set of complicated calculations in seconds.

By 1976, the pocket calculator had rendered the slide rule completely obsolete. Today, the International Space Station relies on over 1.5 million lines of code to run the United States segment alone. That's a lot of sliding calculations.

SEE ALSO: There's more to this beautiful space image than meets the eye

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Scientists Discovered What Actually Wiped Out The Mayan Civilization


The man who designed Victoria’s Secret angel wings will now be designing NASA spacesuits

$
0
0

NASA Astronaut

As the era of civilian space travel draws nearer with the successful launch and return of a reusable spacecraft, NASA is now faced with the challenge of creating a lightweight and cost-efficient suit for space-bound citizens.

Enter Ted Southern, visionary Brooklyn artist and founder of Final Frontier Design. As of December 23, 2014, NASA and Final Frontier Design signed an official Space Act Agreement to collaborate on the new suit.

Southern caught NASA's attention after entering their 2009 Glove Challenge to improve the dexterity and safety of the key piece of equipment. Southern's prize-winning pressurized gloves outperformed NASA's previous model in dexterity and degrees of freedom, and he continued developing the gloves in 2011 when NASA contracted his services further.

But his impressive resume hardly ends there. Southern's intricately engineered bodysuit designs have been featured in Broadway's Spiderman: Turn Off the Dark and the acrobatic spectacle Cirque du Soleil. Perhaps more relevant to the collective consciousness, it is his expertise and indelible panache that helped bring to life Heidi Klum's very massive and iconic Victoria's Secret angel wings.

As a graduate of the Pratt Institute for Design, Southern offers the ideal blend of engineering expertise and sleekness of design. While possessing a keen eye for glitz and glamour, Southern isn't your typical science nerd. He recognizes that space design is particularly challenging because of the external demands that zero gravity and interstellar travel impose on the body, like high speeds and dramatic pressure and temperature differentials.

Southern hopes to design a suit that uses mechanical counterpressure technology, which applies pressure to the skin to offset the effects of the vacuum of space, rather than effectively creating a balloon of pressurized gas around the wearer like suits do today. Though such technology is still far from perfected, if anyone has the ambition and creativity to make it happen, it's certainly Ted.

Russia, China, and countries in Europe are similarly racing to design their own spacesuits. In a burgeoning era of innovation for space technology, it is hard not to compare innovators like Ted Southern to his recent contemporaries. With such talent for design and firm understanding of engineering processes, could Ted Southern be the Steve Jobs of the modern space era? One thing is for certain – space fashion is about to get an upgrade, and it's sure to be chic.

SEE ALSO: Astronauts are already starting to work on space taxis

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Scientists Discovered What Actually Wiped Out The Mayan Civilization

A fireball seen in the skies over the western US was likely a Chinese rocket

$
0
0

smokeSALMON, Idaho (Reuters) - A fireball spotted streaking across the night sky late on Monday in the western United States was almost certainly the body of a rocket used by China in December to launch a satellite, an astronomer said Tuesday.

Residents in Rocky Mountain states such as Idaho, Utah and Montana reported seeing the rocket as it disintegrated in the atmosphere about 70 miles (113 km) above Earth, said Chris Anderson, manager of the Centennial Observatory at the College of Southern Idaho in Twin Falls.

An organization that studies orbital debris, or space junk, and attempts to pinpoint when and where objects will re-enter Earth’s atmosphere had earlier predicted that the rocket which began its descent last year after sending a Chinese satellite into orbit would likely be seen about 2 a.m. local time in northern Russia, Anderson said.

The rocket, which was orbiting Earth about every 87 minutes, made an early appearance elsewhere and in fiery fashion likely because its orientation may have changed as it tumbled through space in its final orbit, affecting the rate of speed, he said.

“It’s devilishly difficult to predict exactly when things will come down and where because it depends so much on the atmospheric drag and the orientation of the object as it plows through the air,” Anderson said.

NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory Solar System Ambassador Patrick Wiggins also told The Salt Lake Tribune newspaper he was "95 percent sure" the fiery sighting was of the re-entry of a Chinese rocket body used to launch the satellite Yaogan Weixing-26 in December.

Space junk like parts of rocket launchers and inactive satellites are a pressing problem for Earth’s orbit, according to the European Space Agency, which in 2013 called for the debris to be removed to avoid crashes that could cost satellite operators dearly and knock out mobile and GPS networks.

A finding by the agency at the time suggested the density of debris was likely to trigger an in-orbit collision every five years. The agency estimated roughly 29,000 objects larger than 4 inches (10 cm) were orbiting Earth at average speeds of 15,500 miles per hour (24,945 kph), or 40 times faster than airplanes travel.

(Editing by Cynthia Johnston and Eric Walsh)

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Scientists Discovered What Actually Wiped Out The Mayan Civilization

Incredible satellite image of the cyclones that battered Australia

$
0
0

Australia Cyclone Lam Cyclone Marcia

Northern Australia was battered by two potent tropical cyclones within six hours on the same day in February 2015.

Cyclone Lam made landfall on the north-central coast near Milingimbi (about 400 kilometers east of Darwin) around 2 a.m. Australian central time on February 19.

Cyclone Marcia made landfall on the east coast of Queensland near Rockhampton and Yeppoon around 8 a.m. local time on February 19.

At landfall, Lam had estimated wind speeds of approximately 165 kilometers (105 miles) per hour; Marcia came ashore with winds of 205 kilometers (125 miles) per hour. Marcia briefly reached category 5, only the sixth storm of that strength since records have been kept in Australia.

According to meteorologist and blogger Jeff Masters, few major cyclones have made it so far south (around latitude 22°S) down the Australian coast.

The Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite on the Suomi NPP satellite captured this view of the two storms around midday on February 19, 2015. The image is a composite of satellite data from two Suomi NPP passes over the area.

As of February 20, no deaths had been reported from the storm, though damage assessments were still to be made in many of the remote towns. Water and power were lost in several areas hit by Lam. Power was knocked out by Marcia for at least 50,000 homes in Queensland.

 

NASA Earth Observatory image by Jesse Allen, using VIIRS data from the Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership. Suomi NPP is the result of a partnership between NASA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the Department of Defense. Caption by Mike Carlowicz.

SEE ALSO: Australia is clearing up after severe cyclones left a trail of destruction

AND: Massive cyclone hits Australia's east coast — 'this will be a harrowing and terrifying experience'

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This Drone Goes Inside A Hurricane To Gather Data That Could Save Your Life

The closest images ever taken of the sun show just how threatening it really is

$
0
0

sunOn a cloudless day, the sun appears warm and inviting from 93 million miles away, but we know better. Upon closer examination with NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO), scientists have seen exactly how menacing the sun truly is. 

For the last five years, SDO has been snapping, on average, one picture every second of the sun's surface. Just last month, the spacecraft took its 100-millionth image, shown to the right.

In celebration of SDO's five years in space, NASA has released two videos of the best images the spacecraft has taken, so far. And these highlights are nothing short of extraordinary, giving us an unprecedented look at the solitary star that makes up 99.86% of the mass in our solar system. 

Despite its bouts of lethal radiation that it flings toward Earth on a regular basis, the surface of the sun is undeniably beautiful. Like Earth, the sun has a magnetic field, but while Earth's magnetic field is hard at work shielding us from most of the sun's harmful radiation, the sun's magnetic field is busy trying to kill us.

Solar flares, like the one below, are the largest explosions in the solar system, releasing ten million times more energy than a volcanic eruption on Earth. They occur when energy builds up within a localized spot on the sun's surface. As that energy eventually grows strong enough, it ejects a tremendous plume of plasma — extremely hot gas — into the sun's upper atmosphere, called the corona.

sun

The energy that produces solar flares comes from the sun's powerful magnetic field. Although the field hangs like a canopy around the sun, the field itself is invisible. But we can see how it affects the gas, like in the example below.

This arch of scorching-hot gas is following the magnetic field lines around the sun, just like how iron filings trace the invisible magnetic field from a bar magnet.

sun

Most of the time, these solar flares last a few minutes and fall back to the sun's surface. But sometimes, they will explode for hours at a time. When that happens, a strong burst can actually release all of that energy and heated gas into the solar system in what is called a coronal mass ejection (CME). 

In 2012, the sun flung a CME in Earth's general direction. If the event had happened one week earlier, the CME would have hit Earth and the high-energy radiation would have fried electronics worldwide, kicking many parts of the world back to the stone ages. 

"If it had hit, we would still be picking up the pieces," Daniel Baker, a researcher at the University of Colorado who published a paper on the event, said in a NASA statement.

sunspotNormally when a geomagnetic storm hits Earth, the radiation that does penetrate our magnetic field interacts with Earth's atmosphere, igniting the Northern Lights. The more powerful the storm, however, the more damage it does. The most powerful storm that ever hit Earth in recorded history knocked out power across the entire city of Quebec in March of 1989.

Scientists are not sure why the sun's magnetic fields are always on the move, which means a solar flare could show up anywhere on the sun at any time. That's why instruments like SDO are gathering information, so that scientists can better understand how the sun generates these enigmatic plumes that are so mesmerizing but dangerous to our technology-rich way of life.

Another useful instrument that will track the sun's activity is currently on a journey through space. Earlier this month, the Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR) rode a SpaceX rocket into space and is now headed for a spot 932,000 miles from Earth. DSCOVR will sound an early-warning alarm system about 30 to 45 minutes before a powerful surge of radiation hits Earth.

Check out one of the amazing videos below, complete with an epic soundtrack: 

CHECK OUT: Physics shows that Mario World has a fundamental flaw

SEE ALSO: There's more to this beautiful space image than meets the eye

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Neil deGrasse Tyson: Here's What Everyone Gets Wrong About Solar Flares

Incredible Vine shows an icy blue sunset on Mars

$
0
0

NASA's Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity has been exploring the Red Planet for more than a decade, and just last year set a new record for traveling farther than any other off-world rover in history.

The rover has driven more than 25 miles on the surface of Mars and during its travels it has taken countless selfies and panoramas, but perhaps the most stunning images in its collection are of this blue Martian sunset, which NASA has compiled into this stunning movie, shown in the Vine below.

 

Opportunity has been exploring a region near Mars' equator, where an average temperature on a summer day can reach up to 70 degrees Fahrenheit. Not bad for a planet more than 140 million miles from the sun. However, without any clouds and only a thin atmosphere to help insulate the planet, after the sun sets, Mars temperatures readily drop to minus 100 degrees Fahrenheit.

And the blue sun in the stunning sunset above is a chilling reminder of the cold temperatures that will follow. The reason that Mars' sky appears red during the day and ignites with a brilliant blue during sunset is because of the red dust drifting through the thin atmosphere.

"The blue color comes from the way Mars' dust scatters light. The blue light is scattered less, and so it stays near the sun in the sky, while red and green are all over the sky," said Mark Lemmon, an associate professor of planetary sciences at Texas A&M University, in a university state mtn. "On Earth, blue light is scattered all over by gas molecules, but there are not enough of these on Mars, which has less than 1 percent of Earth's atmosphere, to accomplish this."

Check out this 50-second video of the Martian sunset:

CHECK OUT: The closest images ever taken of the sun show just how powerful it really is

SEE ALSO: The physics of Mario World show the game has a fundamental flaw

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Scientists are dumbfounded by a mysterious cloud on Mars

NASA astronaut snaps an epic selfie outside the space station during a spacewalk

$
0
0

butch wilmore spacewalk selfie

A NASA astronaut snapped a truly out-of-this-world selfie during a spacewalk over the weekend.

Barry "Butch" Wilmore, commander of the International Space Station's current Expedition 42, took a photo of himself during a spacewalk on Saturday (Feb. 21) that captured a gloriously blue, cloud-studded ocean in the background. Fellow spacewalking NASA astronaut Terry Virts also appears in the shot, reflected in Wilmore's visor.

Wilmore and Virts ventured outside Saturday on the first of three spacewalks in the span of a week. The excursions will help prepare the station for the eventual arrival of private, crew-carrying American spaceships.

"The spacewalks are designed to lay cables along the forward end of the U.S. segment to bring power and communication to two International Docking Adapters slated to arrive later this year,"NASA officials wrote in a description of Wilmore's spacewalk selfie.

"The new docking ports will welcome U.S. commercial spacecraft launching from Florida beginning in 2017, permitting the standard station crew size to grow from six to seven and potentially double the amount of crew time devoted to research," they added.

In September, NASA awarded SpaceX a $2.6 billion contract to complete development of its manned Dragon capsule. Boeing got $4.2 billion to finish work on its crewed vehicle, a capsule called the CST-100.

NASA hopes at least one of these spaceships is up and running by 2017. The space agency has been dependent on Russian Soyuz spacecraft to ferry its astronauts to and from the orbiting lab since the retirement of the space shuttle fleet in 2011.

The other two spacewalks in the current series, which will also be performed by Wilmore and Virts, are scheduled for Wednesday (Feb. 25) and Sunday (March 1) and will start around 7:10 a.m. EST (1210 GMT) on each day. You can watch them live here at Space.com, courtesy of NASA TV, beginning at 6 a.m. EST (1100 GMT).

 

Follow Mike Wall on Twitter @michaeldwall and Google+. Follow us @Spacedotcom, Facebook or Google+. Originally published on Space.com.

Copyright 2015 SPACE.com, a Purch company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

CHECK OUT: The closest images ever taken of the sun show just how powerful it really is

SEE ALSO: The physics of Mario World show the game has a fundamental flaw

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why a NASA mission to Jupiter’s famous icy moon is now a priority

NASA spacecraft 'is about to make history'

$
0
0

ceres

On Friday, NASA's Dawn spacecraft will make history by becoming the first spacecraft to reach a dwarf planet, said Robert Mase, project manager for the Dawn mission at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, during a NASA press conference today.

While Pluto might be the most famous of the dwarf planets, Ceres is the closest at 257 million miles from Earth — just about 100 million miles farther than Mars.

Ceres is the largest object in the asteroid belt — a strip of rocky debris floating in space between Mars and Jupiter. The Dawn spacecraft has been jetting toward Ceres since it was launched in 2007, finally set to approach and orbit its destination around 7:20 am Friday, March 6, after 8 years of travel.

"At its closest approach [on Friday], Dawn is within 25,000 miles to Ceres," Mase said during the press conference. That's about 10 times closer than the Moon is to Earth.

Over the next year, Dawn will descend even closer to Ceres until it's only 230 miles above the surface — lower than the height of International Space Station above Earth. During that time, the spacecraft will study the dwarf planet's rocky surface and its many intriguing features including its mysterious bright spots, craters, and smooth features. The mission will last through June 2016.

Here is a map of the surface of the planet, where you can see its different features: ceres

The smooth features on Ceres, including shallow craters that likely eroded over time, make scientists like Carol Raymond, the Dawn deputy principal investigator at JPL, suspect that Ceres once had a vast ocean beneath its surface. Since Ceres has, at best, a very thin atmosphere, the way these craters likely eroded was by underground water movement stretching and, therefore, flattening them over time.

"It retained a lot of water when it was formed," Raymond said during the press conference. In this sense, it's a lot like the icy moons in the outer solar system, like Saturn's moon Eneceldus and Jupiter's moon Europa — some of the most likely places in the solar system where life could exist.

It's not likely that Ceres still harbors liquid water today, Raymond said, but Dawn will ultimately determine that over the months following its orbit. It will search for any evidence of cracks in the surface where plumes might be gushing water vapor into space.

Here's the latest GIF of the dwarf planet, compiled from recent images taken by the camera aboard Dawn:

ceres

Whether it finds evidence of liquid water, or not, Dawn will still undoubtedly find important information about the early solar system during its time with Ceres, Raymond said.

"One of the prime motivations of the dawn mission is to examine these building blocks of the planets... formed at the very dawn of the solar system," she said.

READ MORE: The closest images ever taken of the sun show just how powerful it really is

SEE ALSO: Incredible Vine shows an icy blue sunset on Mars

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Neil deGrasse Tyson: Pluto Is Not A Planet So 'Get Over It'


Scientists have a plan to make breathable oxygen on Mars for the first time

$
0
0

Jeans and Shirt on Mars_03

When it comes to deep-space travel and exploration, oxygen is one of the most important elements in the mix. Humans breathe it to live and rockets burn it to fly.

That's why a team of scientists at MIT is working on a machine that could make oxygen on Mars. This kind of a set up could play a major part in future manned missions to Mars.

The atmosphere on Mars consists of 96% carbon dioxide and less than 0.2% oxygen (Earth has about 21% oxygen). If astronauts tried breathing the air on Mars, they would quickly suffocate.

But hauling tanks of breathable oxygen to Mars takes up precious space that could otherwise store food and scientific instruments. That's where the Mars Oxygen In situ resource utilization Experiment (MOXIE for short) comes in.

Making oxygen for the first time

MSL Derived_Mars_Sample_Caching_Concept_RoverLast August, NASA announced that MOXIE, along with six other scientific instruments, would get a seat on the Mars rover 2020 mission — NASA's rover mission to follow up on Curiosity's work. Moreover, the Mars 2020 rover will generate electric power the same way as Curiosity, which would power all six instruments on board, including MOXIE.

The mission is projected to cost $130 million and, if fully funded, would launch between July and September of 2020 and land between 150 to 300 days later.

Former NASA astronaut Jeffrey A. Hoffman is a principle investigator for MOXIE and talked to Business Insider at BBC FUTURE's World-Changing Ideas Summit about the project.

"It will be the first time when we will actually produce oxygen on the surface of Mars," he said.

Reducing cost

MOXIE is just the beginning. If this rover-based test is successful, future missions could send larger versions of MOXIE to Mars.

"The objective is to build a 100-time scale of MOXIE some time we hope in the 2030s that will prepare liquid oxygen tanks or equivalent,"Michael Hecht, another principle investigator for MOXIE and assistant director for research management at the MIT Haystack Observatory, told Business Insider.

Those tanks will then store oxygen for breathing and rocket fuel by astronauts "to get them back from the surface of Mars into space in order to come home," Hecht said.

Making oxygen on Mars instead of bringing it along for the deep-space roadtrip would drastically reduce the cost of future manned missions to Mars.

SpaceX Falcon 9 RocketBy estimating how much it would cost to send enough rocket propellant into space that could fuel a rocket on Mars, Hoffman estimates that an oxygen-producing machine 100 times the size of MOXIE could save future Mars missions billions of dollars.

"The amount of oxygen we will need for the rocket is several tens of tons. Let's assume 30 tons," Hoffman told Business Insider in an email. "To get 30 tons of oxygen on the surface of Mars, you need to launch 300 to 450 tons of propellant from the surface of the Earth into Earth orbit.

Since it costs about $10 million to launch one ton of anything into space, this would save a manned mission between $3 and $4.5 billion.

"Now it is probably that launch costs will come down somewhat through efforts of SpaceX and other launch companies, but the cost of launching all this oxygen is still huge, which is why producing it on the surface of Mars can make an expedition more affordable."

Right now, NASA estimates that they could send people to Mars for between $80 and $100 billion. Another company, called Mars One, claims it could put together a mission for $6 billion, but that estimate is suspiciously low.

While on Mars

The way MOXIE works is relatively straightforward: It will take the abundant carbon dioxide in the Martian atmosphere, which is made of one carbon atom and two oxygen atoms, and isolate one of the oxygen atoms. They will then combine the oxygen atoms together to make O2, which is what we breathe here on Earth.

After creating oxygen and carbon monoxide, MOXIE will release those two gases back into the Martian atmosphere.

Geologist, Crew 125 EuroMoonMars B Mission"We're not storing the oxygen for any length of time," Hoffman told Business Insider in a later interview. MOXIE will only hold on to the oxygen for long enough to measure its purity and then release it back into the atmosphere.

With MOXIE, scientists are shooting for 99.6% pure oxygen — the same purity they would shoot for with a larger version of MOXIE. 

It's important to measure the purity of oxygen because "you better be sure that the gas mixture does not contain much carbon monoxide or carbon dioxide," Hoffman said when referring to oxygen future astronauts would use to breathe.

Although the carbon monoxide and oxygen that MOXIE makes will re-enter the atmosphere, this will not hinder the planet's potential biosphere or alter its atmosphere, Hecht explained to Business insider.

"If you release the carbon monoxide into the Mars atmosphere, eventually it will combine with a very small amount of residual oxygen that's there and turn back into carbon dioxide," Hecht said.

Right now, MOXIE is designed so that it will operate for 50 Martian days (about 51 Earth days) and will produce about 20 grams (0.7 ounces) of oxygen per hour.  Hoffman and Hecht hope to send a larger version of MOXIE to Mars some time in the 2030s that would produce about 2 kilograms of oxygen per hour.

Ultimately, the idea is that NASA would send both an empty rocket and a larger version of MOXIE to Mars, before a planned human mission. The oxygen-producing machine would take about a year and a half to fill the rocket with enough liquid oxygen for lift off. Then, when astronauts arrived, they would have a rocket fueled up and ready for launch to take them home, Hoffman explained.

How it works

Mars_1The way MOXIE does this is to basically run like a fuel cell in reverse. To work, fuel cells convert a type of fuel, such as gasoline, into electricity through a chemical reaction that often requires the presence of oxygen.

However, since oxygen is so rare on Mars, MOXIE will instead start with electricity, produced by a separate machine, and use it to extract carbon dioxide in the air to produce breathable oxygen.

Hecht admits in a statement released by MIT that, "It's a pretty exotic way to run a fuel cell on Earth." But this is Mars we're talking about, which changes things.

Over the next year, Hecht, Hoffman, and the MOXIE team will be testing prototypes of MOXIE here on Earth before finally building the real thing in preparation for the upcoming Mars 2020 mission. 

As of right now, NASA has no official approval for Mars missions after Mars 2020, which means a larger version of MOXIE is more an idea than a reality at this point. But it's one step in the right direction. 

"This is what you have to do," Hecht said. "You have to do things for today and you have to prepare to do things for tomorrow."

CHECK OUT: NASA astronaut: Why we need to visit the Moon, not Mars

READ MORE: NASA Mars rover has found organic molecules in Martian soil for the first time

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Research Reveals Why Men Cheat, And It's Not What You Think

NASA has a plan to take the most detailed scans of the world’s forests ever

$
0
0

Amazon forest aerial rainbow Brazil

The story of climate change is closely tied to that of the carbon cycle.

The increasing amounts of carbon dioxide hanging in our atmosphere — as opposed to being locked up in the world's oceans, soils, and forests — are leading to broken heat records and scary predictions of what our world might look like without ice sheets.

To better understand how big a role trees play in this carbon cycle, NASA has recently granted a spot aboard the International Space Station to an instrument to measure the carbon in Earth's forests.

The Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation lidar, or GEDI (pronounced "Jedi", à la Star Wars) will determine the total volume of trees on Earth, and analyze how that figure might have changed over time. That's juicy data, because fully half of a tree's dry weight is carbon.

"If you were to cut the tree down, let it dry out and weigh it, half of its biomass that's there is carbon," Ralph Dubayah, of the University of Maryland, College Park, told Business Insider.

The university designed GEDI, which will be built (at a cost of $94 million) at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center a few miles away. The instrument will make its way to space in 2018.

"The biggest natural sink of terrestrial carbon lies in our forests and trees," Steve Running, of the University of Montana, told NASA's Earth Observatory. "So one of the most important things we can do for understanding the carbon budget is to get a better inventory of the carbon we have in our trees."

The Earth Observatory says that of the nine billion tons of carbon (mostly carbon dioxide) burnt by fossil fuels every year, four end up in the atmosphere, two in the oceans, and three in "ecosystems on land," including forests, but it's still unknown where those sinks are located.

Carbon cycle photosynthesis deforestation atmosphereDubayah describes this land-bound carbon as a missing link in the carbon cycle. Much of it is unaccounted for, but not unlike dark matter, scientists know it's there.

Conversely, some tropical forests may in fact be acting as carbon sources, especially during strong El Niño years in which drought leads to tree death, decomposition, and carbon release.

"We're not quite sure what is happening in terms of are these forests acting as sources or are they acting as sinks, and that's part of what we're trying to figure out," Dubayah said.

A 2004 study on the "source versus sink" question laments that "there are no tropical forest sites for which existing plot data are sufficient to determine whether the forest is acting as a carbon sink or source." Its author, Deborah Clark of the University of Missouri-St. Louis' biology department, told Business Insider that the data gap still stands.

Speaking with Business Insider, Steve Running explained that "we have a good enough idea of the status quo" regarding forest cover across the world. But beyond that, GEDI "would be a real important part of a monitoring system globally that would allow us to very accurately see change."

"We would simply know from one year to the next whether what we thought was on this hectare is still there," Running said.

Brent Mitchell, a lidar specialist at the Remote Sensing Applications Center in Salt Lake City, agrees. "The biggest piece [about GEDI] is having that repeat coverage and being able to monitor things over time," he told Business Insider.

Mitchell has used fixed-wing aircraft in his lidar research for the past five years, but flights aren't frequent enough and don't cover a big enough area to track change on a useful scale.

A space-based instrument could solve that problem.

That's why GEDI matters. Here's how it works.

Lidar technology (a combination of the words "light" and "radar") beams light to a target and analyzes how it bounces back.

LIDAR technology explainer NASA bounce"So you have this kind of bell-shaped distribution of energy, that's going towards the surface," said Dubayah. "If it hits a totally flat surface it gets reflected straight back as a bell."

Of course, that's not the case for most of Earth's surfaces.

"When it hits a tree, the tree does weird stuff to this bell," he added. "The tree kind of starts to extend it, distorts it, makes it look kind of like an echocardiogram." These changes in the laser light are detected by the instrument when they return.

The information they get back is precise enough to "detect subtle variations, including the tops of trees, the ground, and the vertical distribution of above ground biomass in forests," according to NASA's release about the project.

LIDAR NASA explainer technology tree canopyAt any one time, GEDI will shoot three beams across several tracks each 500 meters apart. "We'll take those facts and we'll make estimates of the distribution of canopy height within 500 meter cells," said Dubayah.

The team will also combine their data with other satellite data — including that from the Landsat program— to fill in the blanks.

The measurement they're after is metric tons per hectare. To help them convert their data — height and distribution of the woody material — into mass, researchers will bring in their knowledge of the type of trees lying underfoot. Coniferous trees, for instance, aren't as dense as deciduous ones, according to Dubayah: "Oak is a lot heavier than pine."

During a year aboard the ISS, GEDI will fire about 15 billion pulses of light, according to Dubayah (out of concerns for power, the instrument will ramped down when trained over Earth's oceans).

50 north south parallel latitude earth globeBecause of the ISS's orbit, only surfaces between 50th parallel north and 50th parallel south will be subject to GEDI's scrutiny. The instrument can be pointed slightly left or right to maximize coverage, but that still leaves out most of Canada and Russia's boreal (or taiga) forests, which according to TV series Planet Earth make up a third of the trees on Earth.

Another limitation is the sensor is time. GEDI only gets one year on the International Space Station — there are only ten instrument spots in the exposed facility, which makes them very coveted.

ISS international space station exposed facility"What we would really want, though, is to have our own satellite in space so we that don't have this kind of limitation, and so that we can cover boreal forests," said Dubayah.

"Our nominal mission length is one year, which means that we accomplish our science objectives in one year." It would then be up to NASA to decide whether GEDI is worth more valuable time and space aboard the station.

"But our lasers have shown that they can last in space conditions in the lab for now going north of six years," said Dubayah.

"If something's giving great data, you hate to get rid of it."

SEE ALSO: This Stunning Carbon Map Could Unlock A New Way To Fight Climate Change

AND: A Startling View Of How Much Carbon We Emit In A Year

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Animated map of what Earth would look like if all the ice melted

Politics are shifting and it’s bad news for NASA and space exploration

$
0
0

AP30133049

Ever since President George W. Bush’s decision to retire the space shuttles in the aftermath 2003’s Columbiadisaster, NASA’s human spaceflight program has been adrift. Bush told NASA to go back to the Moon. Obama canceled most of those plans, directing the agency instead to a nearby asteroid—a proposal that has proved very controversial among scientists and policymakers. Both administrations held NASA to the unrealistic long-term goal of sending people to Mars with grossly inadequate funding. As the new Republican majority gets settled in Congress and the nation gears up for presidential elections in 2016, it seems increasingly unlikely that a coherent and sustainable plan for the space agency will emerge anytime soon. That reality was evident in Tuesday’s meeting of the Senate Space, Science and Competitiveness subcommittee.

The meeting was chaired by Senator Ted Cruz, the Republican from Texas, Tea-Party firebrand and presidential hopeful. Despite his limited-government, cost-conscious reputation, Cruz came across as a booster of an expansive federal program of human spaceflight—or at least an expensive one. He referred to President John F. Kennedy’s boldness in calling for the 1960s NASA moonshots, and went out of his way to express his strong support for the agency’s ongoing development of the Space Launch System (SLS), a hugely expensive heavy-lift rocket that many have criticized as outdated, inefficient and a prime example of pork-barrel spending. Cruz also praised NASA’s burgeoning efforts to outsource launching crew and cargo to the International Space Station using commercial suppliers such as SpaceX and Boeing. SpaceX is also pursuing its own heavy-lift rocket program, which, if successful, could deliver many of the same capabilities as SLS, but at only a fraction of the cost.

“The national space program is a nonpartisan issue,” said Senator Bill Nelson, a Democrat from Florida and staunch champion of the SLS, responding to Cruz. “Blossoms are breaking out all over Washington, because what you just said, you and I completely agree on.”

Among the guests Cruz invited to testify about the value of human spaceflight at this “critical time” in NASA’s history were Buzz Aldrin, the Apollo 11 pilot and the second man to walk on the Moon, and Mike Massimino, a former space shuttle astronaut and Hubble Space Telescope repairman. Massimino stuck mainly to platitudes about human space exploration creating spin-off technologies, enabling scientific discovery, inspiring young people, and protecting the planet. He did not mention that there are cheaper, more direct ways of accomplishing those things than sending astronauts to Mars. Although his remarks were serious and considered, they perhaps relied too much on the flawed assumption that taxpayers and politicians will be eager to spend hundreds of billions of dollars on human spaceflight because it sometimes makes them feel good.

Aldrin’s testimony couldn’t have been more different. With a vivacity that belied his 85 years, he explained his “Unified Space Vision”—a plan for NASA to surpass its Apollo-era greatness by permanently settling Mars. Aldrin’s idea is to send astronauts on a one-way trip to Mars, because bringing them back would be prohibitively expensive. In his vision, the U.S. would build an interplanetary “cycler” mothership to ferry colonists to Mars, and along the way it would work with the other spacefaring nations and corporations to build moon bases and space stations, visit asteroids, and send an all-female crew on a flyby of Venus. Such audacious efforts, Aldrin said, will be vital to preserve America’s global preeminence through the remainder of the 21st century.

Aldrin ran into some trouble when his cell phone unexpectedly rang during his testimony. After Aldrin fumbled with the phone for several long seconds, Cruz quipped: “Tell us if that’s a call from the space station.”

In a perfect world of unlimited funding and total commitment to space exploration, Aldrin’s all-of-the-above plan would probably work beautifully. However, it seems utterly disconnected from prevailing social, political, and economic realities.

The most surprising moment in Tuesday’s meeting was the measured testimony of Walter Cunningham, the Apollo 7 astronaut who believes that climate change is “one of the greatest scientific hoaxes in history,” according to written testimony submitted beforehand. Appearing before the committee, however, Cunningham steered clear of the “hoax” to emerge as seemingly one of the meeting’s most rational and pragmatic witnesses. NASA, he said, is underfunded and overburdened by too many centers and too many objectives. Politics has “infected the agency,” he said. It sounds perfectly reasonable, except that Cunningham was referring obliquely to NASA’s participation in global-warming research.

Cunningham was gloomy on the future of space travel. “Unless the country, which is Congress here, decided to put more money in it, this is just talk that we’re doing here,” he said. “NASA’s budget is way too low to do all the things that we’ve talked about doing here this afternoon.”

In the ramp-up to a new Presidential administration in 2016, expect more high-level hearings and reports about the nation’s troubled, stretched-too-thin space program, but don’t expect much in the way of progress or solutions. Whether aiming for the Moon, asteroids, or Mars, NASA’s astronauts seem set to just circle the Earth for quite some time yet.

SEE ALSO: NASA spacecraft 'is about to make history'

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why a NASA mission to Jupiter’s famous icy moon is now a priority

Humans are about to make our first visit to a dwarf planet — a mission more than 100 years in the making

$
0
0

ceres

NASA's Dawn spacecraft is on course to make history this Friday when it enters into orbit around the closest dwarf planet to Earth, Ceres.

Ceres is the largest object in a strip of rocky debris, called the asteroid belt, floating in space between the planets Mars and Jupiter. In fact, it was the first dwarf planet ever discovered back in 1801.

At that time, however, it was classified as a planet, and then later as an asteroid. Today, it meets the criteria for a relatively new class of objects called dwarf planets— a classification that includes the much maligned and very loved Pluto.

Ceres will be the second object that Dawn will orbit. And this is what makes Dawn so unique: When it reaches Ceres at around 7:20 am ET on Friday, it will become the first spacecraft in history to ever orbit two bodies in its lifetime.

This is made possible by its ion propulsion system, which gave the spacecraft enough power to escape the gravitational grip of Vesta when it orbited in 2011, and continue on through space toward Ceres. Here's a timeline of Ceres from discovery to Dawn's final approach:

ceres

READ MORE: Scientists have a plan to make breathable oxygen on Mars for the first time

SEE ALSO: You'll never guess what Neil deGrasse Tyson's favorite equation of Einstein's is

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why a NASA mission to Jupiter’s famous icy moon is now a priority

Here's why this Texas Republican's dreams to send people to a star is equally ridiculous and important

$
0
0

milky way

If ever there were an agency that thinks big, it's NASA. The first and only agency to send people to the surface of the moon, NASA has now been asked to develop the technology to send manned missions beyond our solar system, to distant stars.

During a NASA budget hearing on Wednesday, Texas Republican and Chairman of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science and Related Agencies, John Culberson questioned NASA administrator Charles Bolden on the future of NASA, its budget, and its goals.

"I'd encourage you to focus on the development of the next-generation of the rocket propulsion," Culberson said. "The fact that we're still flying rocket engines that's fundamentally been designed by Robert Goddard in the 1920s is just inexcusable."

Specifically, Culberson was asking about NASA's Asteroid Redirection Mission to capture an asteroid. The mission requires new technologies including a long-lasting form of rocket propulsion to haul an asteroid through space.

"The lessons we learn and new technologies we prove through the Asteroid Redirect Mission will put humans one giant leap closer to Mars," according to this NASA video.

But Mars is just the beginning for Culberson. He has far grander aspirations. Quite literally, he wants NASA to reach for the stars.

"Let us ... leave for future generations the development of the first interstellar rocket propulsion system that would carry us to Alpha Centauri and beyond," Culberson said.

Keep dreaming

alpha centauriAlpha Centauri is the closest star to Earth besides our sun. It floats in space about 4.37 light years from Earth, and would therefore take 4.37 years for a spacecraft traveling at the speed of light to get there.

But today's spacecraft, and most likely the spacecraft of future generations, travel at speeds much slower than that.

The fastest spacecraft humans have ever created is the New Horizons mission, which, right now, is headed toward Pluto at a speed of about 36,000 miles-per-hour.

At that speed, it would take about 80,500 years to reach Alpha Centauri.

And New Horizons isn't even a manned mission!

Sending humans to other stars would require two things we've never done before:

  • Live longer in space than anyone in history - 14 months is the longest consecutive amount of time a single human has spent in space
  • Reproduce in space, so that there are actually humans aboard the spacecraft when it reaches Alpha Centauri

Even with next-generation rocket propulsion systems, we can't hope to reach Alpha Centauri within a single generation.

While we joke that this is an impossible dream, Culberson's hopes for advanced rocket propulsion systems are encouraging and hopefully mean that NASA will be funded well enough to develop some amazing new technologies that we're going to need to meet NASA's goal of setting the first astronauts on Mars by the 2030s.

"We'll certainly do everything we can to support you," Culberson said. "It’s a real privilege for me to be in this position to help make some of those dreams of future young people come true."

CHECK OUT: NASA spacecraft 'is about to make history'

SEE ALSO: Scientists have a plan to make breathable oxygen on Mars for the first time

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why a NASA mission to Jupiter’s famous icy moon is now a priority

NASA's Curiosity Mars rover has short circuited

$
0
0

mars rover curiosity telegraph peak

NASA's Mars rover Curiosity experienced an electrical problem last week, and the robot will stay put for a few days while mission engineers try to figure out exactly what happened.

The car-size Curiosity rover suffered a "transient short circuit" on Feb. 27 while it was transferring sample powder from its robotic arm to instruments on its body, NASA officials said. Curiosity halted the activity in response, as it was programmed to do in such situations.

"We are running tests on the vehicle in its present configuration before we move the arm or drive," Curiosity Project Manager Jim Erickson, of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, said in a statement Tuesday (March 3). "This gives us the best opportunity to determine where the short is."

These tests should take several days, after which the consequences of the short circuit should become clearer.

"A transient short in some systems on the rover would have little effect on rover operations. In others, it could prompt the rover team to restrict use of a mechanism," NASA officials wrote in the statement.

Since September 2014, Curiosity has been exploring the base of Mount Sharp, which rises 3.4 miles (5.5 kilometers) into the Martian sky. The recently obtained sample was drilled from an outcrop called Telegraph Peak.

The Curiosity rover is the centerpiece of NASA's $2.5 billion Mars Science Laboratory mission. The six-wheeled rover touched down in August 2012, on a quest to determine whether or not the Red Planet could ever have supported microbial life.

The rover's observations at a location near its landing site called Yellowknife Bay allowed mission scientists to determine that Mars was indeed habitable billions of years ago; Yellowknife Bay was part of a lake-and-stream system that persisted in various forms for long stretches — perhaps tens of millions of years, Curiosity team members say.

Curiosity's analyses of drilled samples were key to this discovery. To date, the rover has drilled and sampled six different Martian rocks, including Telegraph Peak.

Follow Mike Wall on Twitter @michaeldwall and Google+. Follow us @Spacedotcom, Facebook or Google+. Originally published on Space.com.

Copyright 2015 SPACE.com, a Purch company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

SEE ALSO: NASA Mars rover has found organic molecules in Martian soil for the first time

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: An Astronaut Compressed 6 Months In Space Into This Amazing Time-Lapse

7 things you didn't know about the dwarf planet ceres

$
0
0

ceres

On Friday morning (March 6), NASA's Dawn spacecraft will arrive at Ceres, becoming the first probe ever to orbit a dwarf planet.

Ceres is the largest object in the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter, and the closest dwarf planet to Earth. Dawn is expected to provide a wealth of information about Ceres' evolution and composition.

While Dawn's work will be the first in-depth examination of Ceres, astronomers have learned a bit about the dwarf planet already using NASA's Hubble Space Telescope, Europe's Herschel Space Observatory and other instruments. Here are seven weird facts about Ceres. [Dawn's Arrival at Dwarf Planet Ceres: Full Coverage]

1. It was the first asteroid to be discovered

Ceres was first spotted on Jan. 1, 1801 by Sicilian astronomer Giuseppe Piazzi. The asteroid was found after Piazzi followed up on mathematical predictions (later determined to be false) that there should be a planet between Mars and Jupiter.

At first Ceres was called a planet, but as more asteroid belt members were discovered, Ceres was demoted to asteroid. Its status changed again in 2006 when it was promoted to dwarf planet — a classification it shares with Pluto, which was demoted from full-fledged planet that same year in a move that remains controversial today.

2. It was named after the Roman goddess of agriculture

Piazzi called his discovery Ceres after the Roman goddess of harvests and corn. She also was considered the patron goddess of Sicily, according to the Encyclopedia Britannica. In 1803, the element cerium was named after the dwarf planet. Cerium is the most abundant of rare-Earth metals, the encyclopedia says, and (among other occurrences) it is found as a fission product of plutonium, thorium and uranium.

3. It has mysterious bright spots

As Dawn sped towards the dwarf planet in late 2014 and early 2015, astronomers found two surprise bright spots at about 19 degrees north latitude on Ceres, inside a crater. There don't seem to be any mounds or features close to these spots, which suggests that they are not volcanic in origin.

The bright spots indicate a highly reflective material, likely water ice or salts, researchers say. Dawn team members hope the spacecraft will solve the mystery.

ceres

4. Ceres may have a water-vapor plume

The Herschel Space Observatory recently spotted water vapor emanating from Ceres. The plumes appeared to be generated from two locations (including close to where the white spots were found) and could be a product of icy volcanoes, scientists have said.

The vapor may also have sublimated off after a meteorite strike exposed subsurface ice to space. The plume's nature is another mystery for Dawn to investigate.

5. Ceres may harbor a subsurface ocean

Water-vapor geysers would hint at the presence of a subsurface ocean on Ceres, which might be capable of supporting life as we know it, some scientists say.

Icy moons of the outer solar system such as the Jovian satellite Europa and Saturn's moon Enceladus are thought to have underground oceans, which are apparently kept liquid by tidal forces generated by the gravity of neighboring moons and their huge host planets. Ceres would not experience such tidal forces but could possibly retain some radioactive heat from elements in its interior.

6. It's round

Unlike other members of the asteroid belt, Ceres is round, because it's large enough for gravity to mold its shape into a sphere. (Ceres is about 590 miles, or 950 kilometers, wide.) Scientists also believe that round bodies tend to have differentiated interiors, meaning that there are different zones inside of them. Ceres probably has a rocky core, an icy mantle, perhaps some subsurface liquid water and a dusty top layer.

7. It may have an atmosphere

Ceres is relatively far from the sun, but scientists believe its surface temperatures could rise as high as minus 37 degrees Fahrenheit (minus 38 degrees Celsius). If there is any water ice at the surface, it would quickly sublimate — change directly to a gas — which could generate an atmosphere around the dwarf planet. That said, there have only been a few observations of possible sublimation to date. Dawn will be on the lookout for more.

Editor's Note:The online Slooh community observatory will air a special Ceres webcast featuring live telescope views of the dwarf planet on Friday beginning at 1 p.m. EST (1800 GMT). You can watch it live directly at www.slooh.com, or here at Space.com.

 

Follow Elizabeth Howell @howellspace, or Space.com @Spacedotcom. We're also on Facebook and Google+. Originally published on Space.com.

Copyright 2015 SPACE.com, a Purch company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

READ MORE: The closest images ever taken of the sun show just how powerful it really is

SEE ALSO: Incredible Vine shows an icy blue sunset on Mars

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Neil deGrasse Tyson: Pluto Is Not A Planet So 'Get Over It'


Humans just made history by reaching an icy dwarf planet for the first time

$
0
0

ceresNewHomeAnimated

Friday, NASA's Dawn spacecraft became the first space probe in history to ever reach a dwarf planet.

Since it was launched in 2007, Dawn has been accelerating through space and on Friday morning at 9:39 am ET, NASA confirmed that the spacecraft had reached its final: the dwarf planet Ceres.

"We feel exhilarated," Chris Russell, principal investigator of the Dawn mission at the University of California, said in a NASA statement. "We have much to do over the next year and a half, but we are now on station with ample reserves, and a robust plan to obtain our science objectives."

Ceres is the largest object in a strip of rocky debris, called the asteroid belt, floating in space between the planets Mars and Jupiter. In fact, it was the first dwarf planet ever discovered back in 1801. At that time, however, it was classified as a planet, and then later as an asteroid. Today, it meets the criteria for a relatively new class of objects called dwarf planets— a classification that includes the much maligned and very loved Pluto.

ceresDawn is now about 38,000 miles above the surface of Ceres. But over the course of the year it will descend toward the surface, eventually getting closer than the International Space Station is to Earth and snapping pictures of the surface that will be 800 times sharper than what the Hubble Space Telescope could take.

In addition to becoming the first spacecraft to orbit a dwarf planet, Dawn is also the only satellite to orbit two planets during its lifetime. And this amazing achievement is made possible by Dawn's ion propulsion system, which gave the spacecraft enough power to escape the gravitational grip of Vesta when it orbited in 2011, and continue on through space toward Ceres.

As the spacecraft's propulsion system takes it closer to the surface of Ceres, scientists are excited to learn about the planet's composition and find out just what the heck those mysterious white dots, shown in the image above, on its surface could possible be.

READ MORE: Scientists have a plan to make breathable oxygen on Mars for the first time

SEE ALSO: You'll never guess what Neil deGrasse Tyson's favorite equation of Einstein's is

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Why a NASA mission to Jupiter’s famous icy moon is now a priority

Hubble gave astronomers the rare chance to see the same supernova over and over again

$
0
0

supernova1

One hundred years ago, astronomy was a small field, limited by the number of observations scientists made while peering through a telescope. With the advent of space telescopes like the Hubble Space Telescope — and the fast computers to analyze inhuman amounts of data — the field has exploded, and the latest results from Hubble are just one example.

Friday, a team of scientists published an image in the journal Science that is unlike anything ever seen before. The image, shown above, is of a powerful type of cosmic explosion called a supernova. And thanks to the crazy way in which gravity manipulates space, Hubble has caught this exact same supernova four times over, indicated by the arrows in the photo above.

A supernova occurs when a massive star — far more massive than our sun — ends its life in a brilliant and explosive display of light. The light from this particular supernova took 9 billion years to reach Earth.

The reason we can see four different images of the supernova is because of the way that gravity distorts the fabric of space. In 1916, Albert Einstein's general theory of relativity first predicted this behavior, called gravitational lensing, and astronomers have seen numerous examples of it.

Never before have astronomers seen this kind of effect for a supernova, and the rare image could help improve estimates of dark matter, the elusive, invisible material that makes up a quarter of everything in the universe.

The way gravitational lensing works is when an extremely massive object, like a galaxy cluster, curves the space around it — like the way a bowling ball would curve a trampoline. If you stand on one side of the trampoline and role a marble across to your friend on the opposite side, the marble's path would not be straight but instead would follow the curve made by the bowling ball.

The same thing happens for light traveling through space. The bowling ball in this case is a galaxy cluster called MACS J1149.5+223 and is located 5 billion light years from Earth. Below is an image showing how the closer galaxy cluster bends light from the supernova toward Earth.

astronomerso"The massive galaxy cluster focuses the supernova light along at least three separate paths," Jens Hjorth, from the Dark Cosmology Centre in Denmark and a co-author on the paper, said in a statement released by the European Space Agency. "And then when one of those light paths happens to be precisely aligned with a single elliptical galaxy within the cluster, a secondary lensing effect occurs."

This secondary lensing effect actually magnifies the supernova so that it appears 20 times brighter than its natural brightness.

supernova3Although astronomers can see all four spots of light at the same time right now, it won't always be the case.

Each speck of light took a different amount of time to reach Earth because it traveled along a different path through space. Therefore, when the light from the supernova blinks out, astronomers will see the dots disappear one at a time.

And by measuring how long it takes between each disappearing act will give the team a better idea of how much dark matter is around the galaxy cluster. Galaxy clusters are thought to form in massive cocoons of dark matter, but it's difficult to determine just how massive. Rare events like this will help astronomers nail this mystery down and better understand where clumps of dark matter form in the universe and how they affect the way galaxy clusters form and evolve.

CHECK OUT: Amazing images of what Mars looked like with water

SEE ALSO: You'll never guess what Neil deGrasse Tyson's favorite equation of Einstein's is

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Astronomers Just Discovered A Mysterious Spacetime-Bending Object From A Galaxy-On-Galaxy Collision

Most Americans would turn down a free trip to space

$
0
0

rocket

Imagine that Elon Musk shows up at your front door. He tells you that you've just won an all-expenses-paid trip to space.

Would you go?

If you said yes, you probably won't find very many people who would give the same answer.

A new poll from Monmouth University found that only about one out of every four Americans would say yes to a free trip to space on board a commercial company's rocket.

In December, 2014, Monmouth University asked 1,006 U.S. adults "If you won a free trip on a private company’s rocket ship into space, would you take the trip, or not?" Only 28% said yes, and only 3% were undecided. The other 69% were certain they would turn down the trip.

Interestingly, Americans had a similar attitude toward space travel in 1960s during the space race. Only 17% said they would be interested in traveling to the moon themselves, according to a Gallup Poll from 1966.

Neither poll offers much insight into why Americans feel so hesitant about space travel, whether it's fear of the trip itself or the belief that it's not worth the cost it takes to get people into space.

Patrick Murray, director of the polling center at Monmouth, said one thing that is clear from the poll is that people are excited about the idea of space travel, but they "balk at the price tag."

While a majority think that our trip to the moon came with a lot of long lasting benefits, only 51% think it's a good idea to increase NASA's budget, according to the 2014 poll.

NASA has suffered budget cut after budget cut, and more cuts are likely on the horizon. Right now its budget is about $18 billion per year. Both the Bush administration and the Obama administration have encouraged NASA to pursue a manned mission to Mars, but a mission of that scale will require a huge budget likely around $80 billion to $100 billion, and would take decades to get there.

issThe poll in December also asked if Americans thought we should be allocating billions of dollars to make manned missions to Mars or the moon a reality. Only 42% thought it was a good idea.

That's bad news because these missions are already underfunded. Reports have shown that NASA's SLS rocket, which is designed to get humans to Mars, is missing hundreds of millions of dollars in funding if we're planning on getting there by the 2030s.

The fate of the International Space Station is also up in the air. A Pew Research Center poll conducted in January found that only 64% of Americans think the station is worth the cost it takes to maintain it.

Russia has only agreed to back the station until 2024. Right now Russia provides the shuttle service that gets astronauts to and from the station. NASA has no contingency plan to start providing its own shuttle. Instead, they're relying on private companies like SpaceX to develop rockets capable of getting humans to and from the station.

SEE ALSO: Here's why this Texas Republican's dreams to send people to a star is equally ridiculous and important

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Peter Diamandis: The first trillionaire is going to be made in space

Crazy temperature map of the US shows how bipolar February was

$
0
0

north america land surface temperature Earth Observatory

North America had two distinct weather profiles in February 2015, with a stark east-west difference. In meteorological terms, you would call the pattern an abnormally strong dipole.

While many parts of the parched West experienced record-warm temperatures in February, people in the East shivered through unusually cold weather and a series of winter storms that threatened—and in some cases broke—snow records.

This map of land surface temperature (LST) anomalies depicts the temperature contrast between eastern and western North America.

Observed by satellites uniformly across the landscape, land surface temperatures are not the same as air temperatures.

Land surface temperature is a measure of heating of the land surface—where solar energy is absorbed and re-emitted—and it is often significantly hotter than air temperature.

Based on data from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on NASA’s Terra satellite, the map depicts temperatures for February 2015 period compared to the 2001–2010 average for the same month.

Areas with warmer than average temperatures are shown in red; near-normal is white; and areas cooler than average are blue.

While large swaths of Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and Wyoming experienced temperatures that were more than 10 degrees Celsius (18 degrees Fahrenheit) above average, states in the Midwest, Mid-Atlantic, and New England were 10 degrees Celsius below normal.

Meanwhile, many cities saw air temperature records fall. Worcester, Massachusetts, with an average air temperature of -10 degrees Celsius (14 degrees Fahrenheit), had its coldest month on record.

Records also fell in Bangor, Maine; Marquette, Michigan; and Syracuse, Buffalo, and Rochester, New York.

In many cases, records were not simply broken; they were obliterated. Syracuse broke the old record by 3 full degrees Fahrenheit (1.6 degrees Celsius) and Bangor did so by 2.3 degrees Fahrenheit, even though such records are usually broken by just a fraction of a degree, according to The Washington Post Capitol Weather Gang.

Meanwhile San Francisco, Seattle, Portland, Las Vegas, and Salt Lake City all experienced their warmest winter months on record, according to an analysis of February temperatures published by NOAA.

NOAA TempsMost meteorologists attribute the sharply contrasting temperatures to the combination of a persistent ridge of high pressure—nicknamed the “Ridiculously Resilient Ridge”—over the northeastern Pacific Ocean, and an equally persistent trough that has funneled chilly air from the Arctic into central North America.

But why that resilient ridge has appeared over the northeastern Pacific during the last few winters is a more complicated and controversial question among experts.

A new line of research suggests that the loss of Arctic sea ice associated with global warming may be causing the jet stream to slow down and become wavier, thus setting up the unusual pattern over North America.

Other researchers think there could be a link between Siberian snowfall and mid-latitude weather extremes. Still others think changes in the Arctic have little to do with mid-latitude weather extremes; instead they see periods with an anomalously sharp gradient in sea surface temperature in the far western Pacific as the key factor.

All participants looking at the question agree: more research is needed.

SEE ALSO: NASA has a plan to take the most detailed scans of the world’s forests ever

AND: A Startling View Of How Much Carbon We Emit In A Year

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Economists Figured Out The Real Reason It's Nearly Impossible To Get A Taxi In The Rain

The US Air Force could certify SpaceX to launch military satellites by June

$
0
0

The unmanned Falcon 9 rocket, launched by SpaceX and carrying NOAA's Deep Space Climate Observatory Satellite, lifts off from launch pad 40 the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Cape Canaveral, Florida February 11, 2015.  REUTERS/Scott Audette

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Air Force hopes to certify privately-held Space Exploration Technologies, or SpaceX, to launch some U.S. military and intelligence satellites into space using its Falcon 9 rocket by June, a top official told Reuters on Tuesday.

"I think we're still looking at ... June," Lieutenant General Ellen Pawlikowski, the top uniformed officer in charge of Air Force acquisition, told Reuters after a speech at the annual Women in Defense conference.

Pawlikowski, nominated by President Barack Obama to head Air Force Materiel Command, said she was disappointed the Air Force had not been able to certify SpaceX for the launches by December, as initially hoped, but said she was "encouraged that we're close."

The general said allowing SpaceX to enter a market dominated by United Launch Alliance, a joint venture of the two top Pentagon suppliers, Lockheed Martin Corp and Boeing Co, would let the Air Force leverage the commercial market and help reduce the cost of launching satellites into space.

Pawlikowski, who trimmed the cost of satellite programs by $3 billion during her tenure as the head of Air Force Space and Missiles Systems Center, welcomed a variety of initiatives under way across the Pentagon to benefit from investment by commercial firms like SpaceX.

She cited some lingering institutional resistance to change, but said the Air Force was working more closely with industry to understand how simple adjustments in requirements for weapons systems could lower costs and free up resources for other work.

She said one key step was empowering acquisition officials to look at innovative products and solutions instead of turning to the same suppliers and products that had always been used.

(Editing by Jeremy Laurence)

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: This 26-year-old from Baltimore took a 35,000-mile road trip and ended up fighting in the Libyan revolution

Viewing all 3026 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>